Categories
Activism Healthy Living Raw Dairy Real Food

The Truth About Raw Milk, Part I

www.mypicshares.com

Raw milk is a hot topic in the news and media these days. And with good reason. It’s a subject that is near and dear to my heart, and it’s very important to become informed about it, but not because drinking it will make you sick.

Today you will read about the history of pasteurization and the health benefits of raw milk as discussed by health professionals, two journalists, and a steward-conscientious and progressive dairy farmer.

The second installment, Part II of this series will cover my family’s personal testimony of consuming raw milk, what to ask your farmer when buying raw milk, and action steps you can take to assure raw milk is available in the future for everyone.

The reason why raw milk is so important is because of its value as a nutrient-dense and versatile food that has been consumed for thousands of years by people all over the world to maintain health. And now more than ever, raw milk is a symbol of our freedoms and rights as citizens of this country, to preserve our abilities to be able to have access to real food that nourishes our bodies.

If you aren’t familiar with the struggles happening over raw milk and the right to sell, buy, and produce it, now is a good time to become acquainted with what’s been going on. Raw milk has received an unfair reputation for many years as being a food that carries disease and harmful bacteria. But the truth is, raw milk from healthy cows on pasture contains life-giving nutrients and probiotics – something we are lacking more and more in food choices in the modern world.

Processing, packaging, heating, denaturing, and the adding of preservatives, chemicals, antibiotics, hormones, pesticides, and other toxic substances is destroying the value of nutrition in foods we know today. The integrity of milk as nature’s most perfect food has never been in such jeopardy as it is in modern times.

The history of pasteurization

Pasteurization came about as a result of urban dairies springing up in the late 1800s and early 1900s to supply milk to the growing population, and to control disease conditions occurring during that time period.

According to Nina Planck, author of Real Food:

“It was a response to an acute and growing public health crisis, in which infectious diseases like tuberculosis were spread by poor-quality milk [from these dairies]. Previously, milk came to the kitchen in buckets from the family cow or in glass jars from a local dairy, but soon, urban dairies sprang up to supply the growing populations in or near cities such as New York, Philadelphia, and Cincinnati.”

Owners put the dairies next to whiskey distilleries to feed the confined cows a cheap diet of spent mash called distillery slop. For distribution, the whiskey dairies were inefficient: in 1852, three quarters of the milk drunk by the seven hundred thousand residents of New York City came from distillery dairies. The last one in New York City (in Brooklyn) closed in 1930.”

The quality of “slop milk”, as it was known, was so poor it could not even be made into butter or cheese. Some unscrupulous distillery dairy owners added burned sugar, molasses, chalk, starch, or flour to give body to the thin milk, while others diluted it with water to make more money. Slop milk was inferior because animal nutrition was poor; cows need grass and hay, not warm whiskey mash, which was too acidic for the ruminant belly. Cows on fresh grass produce more cream, a measure of milk quality.”

Conditions were un-hygenic, too. In one contemporary account cited in the Complete Dairy Food Cookbook, distillery cows “soon became diseased; their gums ulcerate, their teeth drop out, and their breath becomes fetid.” Cartoons of distillery dairies show morose cows with open sores on their flanks standing or lying in muck in cramped stables. Bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis were common, and cow mortality was high. The people milking the cows were often unsanitary and unhealthy, too. Dairy workers could taint milk with tuberculosis and other diseases.”

This contamination, a prevalent occurrence in commercial dairies, caused outbreaks of various diseases – typhoid, scarlet fever, undulant fever (brucellosis), and tuberculosis. The blame for sickness went to the tainted milk. In looking for a solution, public health officials finally decided that pasteurization was the perfect solution to eliminate the problem of contamination. Use of this practice essentially gave license to dairies to continue unsafe and unsanitary production practices in their milking and animal-raising methods.

As Ron Schimd points out in his book The Untold Story of Raw Milk, mandatory inspections and cleanliness were neither considered nor required to maintain sanitation and health safety in producing and selling milk to the public. Through the years, the milk itself was continually put in the doghouse as the culprit of the public’s health woes by various health experts and milk distributors. Why not require farmers to keep cows on grass and manage their care and health properly to avoid disease and illness in the first place? But this did not happen. Ultimately, this resulted in President Roosevelt appointing a panel of experts who required all raw milk to be pasteurized in 1914 in New York City. The requirement to pasteurize spread from there and by the 1950s, it was the law most everywhere.

It should be obvious as to where the problem originated. Raw milk is not dangerous to drink because it’s inherently unsanitary. It becomes a threat to human health and the environment when dairies use more and more hazardous substances like pesticides, antibiotics, genetically-modified organisms,  are not required to maintain healthy standards of animal and land stewardship, and are permitted to treat animals like commodities instead of living creatures that should have access to pasture, sunshine, fresh air and clean water.

In this day and age, when we possess the knowledge and capability of superior animal nutrition, sanitation, testing, storage, and transportation of the milk that comes from cows, it only makes sense to combine the best of nature and technology to enable our species to have access to the most healthful, nutrient-dense, and safe food available. Pasteurization only puts us back in the dark ages of our history, and does not acknowledge the supreme domain and ability to preserve our health and future that nature ultimately possesses.

What good has pasteurization done?

It has provided commercial dairies with the ability to not be accountable for producing a clean product, and if harmful bacteria are present – which they always are, they are simply obliterated through heat, and so are any good bacteria that might be present in the milk. Then those bacteria can be masked (at least some of  the time) with pasteurization practices. It has also provided big agricultural business with an efficient way to sell products far and wide and keep them on the shelf longer, thus making more profits. All at the expense of our health, of course.

What’s left in pasteurized milk is simply dead bacteria. So when you drink pasteurized and processed milk, you are drinking bacteria that has died. That’s the reason there is a shelf life on pasteurized milk, because at some point the milk goes from being dead to completely toxic. You can’t drink pasteurized milk past its date without health problems, but raw milk simply grows more and more plentiful in helpful bacteria and can be used for many things – buttermilk, yogurt, kefir, cheese, kefir, clabbered milk and a variety of healthful foods.

Did you know that pasteurized milk is routinely tested – but for coliforms, not pathogens? What’s the difference? Coliforms are a species of microorganisms which comprise most of the intestinal flora of an organism, while a pathogen is a disease-producing agent.

From the Organic Pastures web site: “These include Para TB,  viruses, bacteria and spores that survive pasteurization. This is something that the dairy industry and CDFA will not share with you. These bacteria do not exist in raw milk for human consumption. They are eliminated by specialized testing of raw milk cows and by other sanitary methods not used on conventional dairies.” Because of this fact, a person can contract a foodborne illness from milk even if it has been pasteurized.

Yes, you read that correctly.

In the state of California, raw milk undergoes testing for pathogens thousands of times annually. To date, no pathogens have ever been found in milk from either Organic Pastures (Fresno) nor Claravale Farm (Paicines).

Not only is raw milk better for your health, it is also safer than pasteurized milk. In his book The Raw Milk Revolution, David E. Gumpert revealed that in the state of Massachusetts no deaths are on record from drinking raw milk. But pasteurized milk containing the pathogen Listeriosis was responsible for the deaths of 3 people in 2007.

An In These Times web site article disclosed the following CDC data: from 1993 to 2006 there were 116 illnesses annually connected to raw milk , “or less than .000002 percent of the 76 million people who contract food-borne illnesses every year in the United States.”

There’s milk, and then there’s milk

There are actually two types of raw milk. According to Mark McAffe of Organic Pastures (the country’s largest raw dairy), here are the primary differences between them:

1) There’s the raw milk intended to be consumed raw

and

2) There’s the raw milk intended to be used for pasteurization, and contrary to popular belief, they are NOT the same.

When you consider purchasing raw milk, you must be certain to find milk that has been produced with the intention of being consumed raw, and not just raw milk from conventionally-raised cows that hasn’t gone through the pasteurization process yet.

There’s a vast difference between the quality and safety of milk from organically-raised, grass-fed cows, and conventionally-raised, grain-fed livestock. Cows fed on grain, soy, corn, and other inappropriate feeds develop an acidic digestive environment and eventually become ill. Cattle are ruminants, meaning their digestive tracts are designed to consume grasses, not grains. When a ruminant consumes grains, all bets for healthy milk are off. This is why farmers administer antibiotics to their herds – because the feed causes the internal environment to develop pathogenic bacteria and this makes the milk harmful for consumption.

Health benefits of raw milk

Raw milk that is organically-sourced from cows on pasture is naturally rich in healthy bacteria, including lactobacillus and acidophilus. There are also several coliform families of bacteria present in raw milk that are important for health. What most people don’t know is there are actually over 230 different kinds of E. coli. Of those, only two or three of them are actually pathogenic and will cause sickness. The rest are extremely beneficial to your immune system and digestion.

Raw milk also contains vitamins, which are virtually eliminated by the pasteurization process of commercial milk. But it’s the presence of beneficial bacteria are what make raw milk such an outstanding food source to promote the growth of healthy bacteria in your intestine, which in turn has a significant, beneficial impact on your overall immune function.

Other health promoting ingredients in raw milk include (source, Dr. Mercola with guest Mark McAfee):

  • Valuable enzymes that are destroyed during pasteurization. Without them, milk is very difficult to digest. So if you have lactose intolerance, it may very well disappear once you start consuming raw dairy products. It also contains phosphatase, an enzyme that aids and assists in the absorption of calcium in your bones, and lipase enzyme, which helps to hydrolyze and absorb fats.
  • Enzymes are deactivated when you get above 120 degrees. By the time you get to 150, 160 degrees, almost all of them are completely inactivated, which is why you will not get ANY of these benefits from pasteurized milk.
  • Natural butterfat, which is homogenized or removed in pasteurized milk. Without butterfat, it becomes very difficult for your body to absorb and utilize the vitamins and minerals in the water fraction of the milk. Butterfat is also your best source of preformed vitamin A, and contains re-arranged acids with strong anti-carcinogenic properties.
  • Healthy, unoxidized cholesterol
  • Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which fights cancer and may help reduce your body fat
  • High omega-3 and low omega-6 ratios, which is the beneficial ratio between these two essential fats

From Dr. Al Sears, M.D.:

I come from a family of farmers, and milk was a staple of my diet growing up. We’d have it delivered to the house in glass bottles and go through a gallon a week per person. When I’d go to my grandma’s, she’d pour me a glass straight from the bucket…straight from the cow.

Back then, we never worried about whether milk was raw or pasteurized, and we were healthy, strong, and never sick a day. Today, you won’t find raw dairy products in your local grocery store. It’s against the law in some states.

Raw milk from grass-fed cows has been used for disease prevention since the time of Hippocrates.

Grass-fed raw milk builds immunity. Any time you build immunity, you help prevent disease. When you build immunity high enough, you set up a protective shield around you that prevents germs and viruses from attacking. You can walk into a room full of cold and flu victims and never catch a thing.

Grass-fed raw milk is a good source of important disease fighters like vitamins and minerals, essential fatty acids, amino acids, and good bacteria to strengthen your immune system. When you pasteurize milk, the heat destroys all of the immune-fighting properties. Grass-fed raw milk also contains the most important health-building ingredient of all: enzymes. Enzymes are inflammation fighters and immune builders too. But they are destroyed within minutes by heat during pasteurization.

Here’s a sample of what is lost:

  • Amylase: breaks down carbohydrates in food as it is digested
  • Catalase: a strong antioxidant that protects cells
  • Lactase: what’s missing when people develop lactose intolerance. Lactase makes it easier to absorb other nutrients as well.
  • Lipase: breaks down fats like triglycerides and improves the way your body uses them
  • Phosphatase: helps your body absorb and use the calcium and phosphorus in milk.
  • Lactoferrin: helps protect you from disease. Lactoferrin defends the body against invasion by bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. Lactoferrin has the same protection-fighting power as mother’s breast milk for an infant.

Check back tomorrow for Part II where you can read the personal testimony of my family’s experience drinking raw milk and how we have benefited from its consumption.

You will also find information about how to make good choices when buying raw milk, where to go to find it, and questions you should ask your local farmer.

You’ll learn how to become involved to support a vibrant, growing, and passionate community of people who love raw milk and want to continue to be able to have access to it for the sake of freedom as well as health.

This post is also part of Sustainable Eats Simple Lives Thursday Blog Hop. Please visit this great site and share your posts there!

57 replies on “The Truth About Raw Milk, Part I”

This was a very good read, good information. I don’t think our federal government cares about the health of the people in this country as much as they care about the money put in their pockets.

I am a NYS Certified seller of raw milk, so naturally I was delighted, and in full agreement with your article. I was puzzled by your statement about Listeria only being found in pasturized milk. I just read about a raw milk dairy being shut down because of the presence of Listeria in their milk. Of course, to date, no one has reported getting sick from the milk, but none-the-less, NYS did shut them down. Could you clarify?

Becky – I did not say that Listeria is only found in pasteurized milk. The statement says that in Massachusetts, 3 people died from drinking pasteurized milk with Listeriosis. I hope that clears up the confusion. Any milk that is not handled properly or that comes from an unclean source such as those described in the post can develop pathogenic bacteria like Listeria, pasteurized or not.

Rainie baby! I am going to send these two articles to my father. He is a retired doctor who, while greek, was born and raised in china, took his medical training in north vietnam and paris before coming to the united states. He argues with me related to the pasteurization as in the case of asia 60 years ago, pasteurization did in fact save lives. What he fails to address is that Asians were not drinking milk! thanks for some ammunition! Of course, I will continue to drink raw milk and create amazing health for my family no matter if he agrees or not! Cant wait for tomorrow’s installment! Hugs! Alex

What a fantastic synopsis — I’m also sending people a link when they ask why we drink raw milk. Thanks for organizing all the important nuggets of info into a concise, well-written post!

Wardeh – thanks for reading this article, I know I’m preaching to the choir with you and many others who read this blog, but I also know that new people come over all the time who are hungry for this knowledge and are eager to learn and understand all that real food has to offer. Thank you for your kind comments and well wishes. They are much appreciated! Blessings to you and your family as well. 🙂

Raine, what a post! Oh my… fabulously written and researched. I actually read this post first on my local Weston Price Foundation google group! I will indeed be passing on this post to anyone asking questions about raw milk. Thanks Raine for posting this over at Simple Lives Thursday 😀

Thank you for the article. I hadn’t known there was a resurgence in raw milk. I haven’t had it for about 30 years and find myself commenting on occassion how much I miss it. I’ll have to check around the North Dallas area to see if it is available.

However, what concerns me about this article is the lack of balanced statistics. When I see ‘there were 116 illnesses annually, or less than .000002 percent…’, it is like saying ‘fewer people die in passenger trains than automobiles’. It doesn’t tell me anything useful. Useful would be ‘X people die each year Per Mile Ridden in trains while Y people die Per Mile Ridden in automobiles’. While it’s obvious that fewer people die in passenger trains, it is also true that trains are about the least safe way to travel – Per Mile.

So what are the morbidity and mortality numbers (associated directly to the consumption of raw milk) Per Number Of People Who Drink Raw Milk versus the numbers (associated directly to the consumption of pasteurized milk) Per Number Of People Who Drink Pasteurized Milk? That is information that will allow people to evaluate the benefits versus the risks and make an informed decision for themselves and their families.

Andrew – once again, the article specifically states that there are two types of raw milk – that which is intended for human consumption from healthy cows on pasture and that which is produced from industrial sources like CAFOs and factory farms. Because this important distinction is made, the amount of deaths associated with raw milk as reported by mainstream sources like the CDC would never be accurate. Why? Because the sources like the CDC never make this distinction. There is an enormous difference between raw milk produced in unsanitary conditions and

Here are some basic statistics I found that report numbers of deaths annually from “raw milk consumption” (and these same numbers are listed on dozens and dozens of different sites ranging from CDC, FDA, USDA, to blogger and news sites):

“Raw milk is milk that has not been pasteurized. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), raw milk or raw milk products were implicated in 45 outbreaks that resulted in over 1,000 illnesses and two deaths in the United States during 1998-2005.”

I actually called the CDC to find out the exact information you asked for: morbidity rates associated with drinking raw milk per # of people who drank raw milk. Per conversations I had with 4 CDC specialists – including an epidemiologist and public health specialist, there is nothing available with this type of comprehensive statistical information.

I was given various web site links with statistics on particular disease outbreaks (such as Campylobacter or Listeria, and none of these sites showed any mortality rates – only numbers of people who became sick and/or hospitalized) during specific years in certain states, but no mortality rates associated with drinking raw milk in general over a specific span of time. So unfortunately what you and I are seeking doesn’t actually exist that has been compiled for the purposes of statistical analysis.

I also believe it is difficult to accurately determine accurately the morbidity and mortality rate of people consuming raw milk unless the source of milk is revealed in the analysis. The CDC and other mainstream sources of statistical information don’t disclose that information when releasing general information like the statistic above – the 1998 to 2005 span of time with 45 outbreaks, over 1,000 illnesses, and only 2 deaths reported.

Mark McAfee of Organic Pastures states in his interview (of which I provided the link) that in 10 years of business, there has not been one single pathogen found in their milk and therefore no sicknesses or deaths. That is because when the milk is handled properly, no sickness or death occurs from drinking it. The same cannot ever be said about operations producing raw milk using the following practices – cows housed on feedlots, fed grain, administered antibiotics/hormones and other toxic substances such as pesticides applied to the feed they consume, and biological and emotional stress from existing in an environment which causes illness and sometimes premature death.

If you want the type of information you are seeking, you need to put pressure on local authorities to report it to government agencies.

I have another call coming back to me from the CDC either today or tomorrow, and I will report any significant findings from the information I receive.

Raine, thank you for working to get the numbers together. Please understand that I am certainly not intending to critical. On the contrary, all your efforts should be applauded. I also don’t intend to minimize the difficulty of the task by saying, ‘just compare gallons to people to illnesses and there you have it.’ There are so many variables to consider; it is daunting. Perhaps there is an advocate out there with a penchant for statistics that could help you out. It would seem to me a good thing to be able to compare apples to apples with the industry.

I’m just a drive-by visitor to your articles; pointed here by my sister-in-law’s blog (http://www.uponlavenderhill.blogspot.com/). As a doula, this is a topic of which she is keenly aware and passionate. As pediatric home care nurses for handicapped children, my wife and I have said for many years that ‘synthetic may maintain, but natural heals.’ I pray you keep up the excellent work.

I apologize, somehow the end of the information on the first paragraph somehow was not completed:

The comparison between milk produced conventionally and from cows on feedlots, administered antibiotics/hormones/pesticides in their feed or other wise doesn’t compare to that from healthy, grass-fed cows who are sustainable or organically-raised without chemicals or pesticides is vast indeed.

Wow Raine. Thank you so much for pulling this together. Due to lack of time and mental energy I’ve stopped engaging in the raw vs past milk discussion. I just do what is right for me and my family. So while you may be preaching to the choir here you have given us a resource that we can use to point other non-choir members to. I can’t thank you enough. This is so wonderfully put together.
xo!

Once again, Raine — you rock. I got into a comment debate with anti-raw-milk folk yesterday, at a Slate article. The nay-sayers are stuck on those CDC numbers, saying that raw milk advocates use them incorrectly (something about reported vs. estimated illnesses, etc). I’m not a statistician, and could not rebut their claims.

I was forgetting, though, the whole time — the CDC never publishes data that separates the sources, and whether the milk comes from healthy cows. That is a HUGE factor, one that sadly will probably never be studied.

When we went on a tour of one of the farms that supply milk to Kroger, the place smelled awful! Their cows had nasty diarhea (sp?) all over the place, ate their grain, and looked sickly.
Now, the farm we get our raw milk from, their cows have these nicely formed cow patties, the smell is quite natural and fresh, and they look uber content.

Which milk do you want? =’) mmmmmm
Live Life Nourished!!
Amber

Alex – I would love to offer you a spare room! Wouldn’t that be fun??? We could make food, watch our favorite movies, and just be silly girls. 🙂 Thanks for linking to me again, I so appreciate it! You are the best! 🙂

Amber – that is so interesting that you toured one of the commercial milk companies. I am not surprised that you witnessed what you saw, but it proves, at least from an observer’s standpoint, that there is a BIG difference between real milk and garbage milk. YES, I absolutely want the real thing! I won’t take any substitute!!!

Absolutely wonderful article AND useful, helpful comments from everyone! I’d like to add something that the “Mom” at the beautiful central-Virginia farm where I get my splendid raw milk (and butter and cheese, etc.) shared at a conference. She said that some of her neighbors, basically conventional dairy farmers, have tried to be better stewards of their animals and land, feeding primarily grass and hay and maintaining sanitary conditions. That is surely admirable and a blessing for the animals; but it doesn’t really have an impact on the wholesomeness of the milk, because that farmer’s milk is mixed with the milk from dozens–hundreds?–of other farms, some with dismal conditions, and then of course it goes through the pasteurizing, centrifuging, homogenizing, storage, transport processes. So don’t be distracted if (when) there are dairy council ads highlighting these good practices and farmers. If they are sending their milk along the usual pipelines, it is no better for our health. Now excuse me while I go have a nice big glass of fresh cold creamy Jersey milk and a slice of apple pie made with some homely local apples, fresh raw butter in the crust, and plenty of cinnamon from somewhere in Asia. Important to remember, with gratitude, that we depend on far-flung farmers for adding some precious ‘spice,’ (and caffeine) to our tables! Blessings to everyone!

Amazing article! We are definitely living in a dark ages despite what many people think. We now have the technology and knowledge to live sustainably and make real food available to the public at large. I wonder if we’ll ever get out of these medical and food dark ages.

Isn’t it also a factor that mainstream medicine, the CDC and the FDA are biased against raw milk, so when a person gets sick and it is discovered they drink raw milk, that the raw milk could be blamed even though it may not be the cause of the illness? And likewise pasteurized milk is assumed safe, so even thought it may be the cause, it would not likely be suspected?

I am from România and I found this article looking for a diet for lazy gallblader. I do not know how can I buy this raw milk good for consumption…how do I know, if I buy it from diferent farmers and not from state markets, what the cows have been eating ??
Can I buy it from public markets if the milk is raw and not pasteurizet ??

His awards arrived later on from Tv’s The
West Wing. COM domain name, or whether you can live with something creative or SIL.
The truth is that Hollywood cranks out golden ages each decade
with new innovations and new stars.

Have a look at my website … moviestarplanet cheats for money
(Norma)

Moreover, Ben 10 Ultimate Alien toys which are created by Bandai
have been sold worldwide especiazlly in Asiia
and USA and have ever since been in great demand. Of course each
store hass a different selection and policy -Some offer
layaway -etc. The website Vintage Gradedd Football cards
has great information on collecting vintage football cards and links directly
to some of the best footbal cards too own via a partnership with e – Bay.

Alsoo visit my web page – fishe price baby gear product
guide, Micah,

I was recommended this blog by way of my cousin. I’m
not certain whether this post is written by way of him as nobody else
understand such precise about my problem. You are amazing!
Thank you!

Hi superb website! Does running a blog similar to this take a massive amount work?
I have no understanding of computer programming but I was hoping to start my own blog soon.
Anyway, should you have any suggestions or tips for new blog owners please
share. I know this is off subject but I just wanted to ask.

Thanks!

Wonderful goods from you, man. I have bear in mind
your stuff prior to and you are just extremely excellent.

I really like what you have bought here, really like what you’re stating and the way through which you say it.
You’re making it entertaining and you continue to care for to stay
it smart. I can not wait to learn far more from you.
This is actually a terrific site.

Acne should always be treated as a sensitivity of the skin, not something that needs to be dried up and
withered away like so many harsh products
on the market will do. If you have scars from acne, there are treatments available.
Anyway, it is every woman’s dream to have a loving husband and kids to take care of.

The high end brands that this store features are Opium, b:
Kind, Quicksilver, Inglot, Provogue, Nine West,
Park Avenue, Qup Accessories, Mango, Giordano, Queue Up, M- Square,
Aldo, Polar, Replay, Ferrari and Just For Kids. Expensive junior dresses are designed
very elegantly with quality materials such as
silk, crepe etc. If you do not wish to give into such a costly extravagance, then all you would have to
do is take a look at the current styles and pick one that would satisfy your child’s individuality.

Heⅼlο I am so thrilled I found your web site, I really found
you by mistake, while I was browsing on Yahoo forr somеthing ᥱlse,
Anyhoա I amm heгe now aand wpuld just lik to
sayy cheers fߋr a tremenndous post ɑnd a all rouhnd entertaining blog (I aⅼso love the
theme/design), Ӏ ⅾon’t hɑve time to гead thгough itt all at the momеnt but I hɑѵᥱ
saed іt and also included your RSS feeds, sso ѡhen I have time Ⅰ wiⅼl be back tο
reaɗ a lot more, Please do kеep up the excellent b.

Silahkan Cek website Akuu demi mendapatkan Data lebih komplit tentang resep masakan ayam mudah indonesia .

Terima Kasih

I’m nott ure wheгe үoᥙ’re gеtting your іnformation,
but greɑt topic. I needs to sppend sօme tіme learning much mⲟrе orr understanding mοre.
Thankѕ for magnnificent іnformation I աas lookіng for thiѕ info for my
mission.

Silahkan Cek web Ane hanya untuk mendapatkan Informasi lebiih komplit mengenai jual jas pria murah .
Suwun

whoah this weblog is ǥreat i reallyy lie
studying ʏοur articles. Ҡeep ᥙⲣ tɦe
ɡood ԝork! Youu recognize, mаny ppersons
аге hunting гound fߋr tɦiѕ information, үоu caan Һelp tһеm greatly.

Silahkan Cek halama website Sayya demi dapatkan Data lebih lengkap tentang penjahit blazer pria .
Suwun

I like the helpful information you provide on your
articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and test again right here regularly.
I am slightly sure I’ll be told plenty of new stuff right right here!
Good luck for the next!

Upon his declaration, the Ministry of info and Communications Technology ordered ISPs to instantly shut down about
400 internet sites and stop 1,200 more, all alleged to own disturbed
the social buy or endangered national safety and security.
We received tons of e-emails and we are requested to put together hack for Chaturbate
and also the day came. , just like the other cam girlswho posted
herebefore.

Comments are closed.