Tag Archives: Antibiotics

Activism Healthy Living Raw Dairy Toxin Alert!

Dr. Oz: Organic is “Elitist” & “not much difference” Between Grassfed & Feedlot Beef

www.mypicshares.com

There are sources from all over that seem to want to bad-mouth and discredit the importance of eating sustainable, organic food.

It seems perplexing as to why anyone would want to do this, but some of the biggest motivators against the sustainable food movement are big, powerful corporations selling toxic foods that don’t want this segment of the market edging out their profits.

Those who truly care about their health are snobs?

It’s irksome and tiring hearing conventional authorities of health, agriculture, and medicine continue to behave in such a juvenile manner by using these terms to describe supporters of the real food movement.

In a recent TIME Magazine article, Dr. Oz elaborates as to why you needn’t spend ridiculous sums of money on organic, when it’s really no better than conventional.

 

It’s been said over and over again, that if you buy organic food this somehow makes you an “elitist” or a “snob”. Dr. Oz is the latest in a long-line of “authority” figures to make this claim.

Oh really? I’ll tell you just how non elitist my family is, and we do eat organic, sustainable foods: My husband and I both come from modest, middle-class backgrounds. We attended a state college here in Boise, ID (Boise State University) and worked our way through school. We both worked part-time 20-hour-a-week jobs, and lived off of about $1200 a month for rent, groceries, and other bills.

Like many others, when we graduated we had credit card and student loan debts.  Although my husband was offered a good job in Spokane, WA in 2000 including a sign on bonus and moving expenses, we spent most of it paying student loans, bought a car and some furniture since we had practically none. I worked part-time through this span of my professional career as a technical writer. Shortly after moving, I became pregnant and the work I was doing continued to lessen. After our son was born, I stopped working. We moved back to Boise to be near family since he was born 9 weeks premature because my appendix ruptured and we needed support.

For the first 5 years after my son was born, I didn’t work. In 2006 I worked part-time for the YMCA, then migrated into my current self-employed status of writing and health coaching. In 2009 my husband was laid off from his job. We used our retirement money to start a solar business. Like many other small businesses, we struggled to make ends meet. In 2011, our business partners decided to leave the state without any notice or arrangements, and left us with tens of thousands of dollars in debts, and all the tasks associated with closing down the business. We will be paying those debts off for years.

My husband is now employed full-time again, and we are stable, but money is always tight and we do the best we can. I continue to work full-time hours with part-time pay. But I love my job because I spend all my time educating people about the ways to eat and live well, and to avoid bad advice from “medical professionals” like Dr. Oz.

Each month we prioritize what it is we need to spend our money on, and it amounts to this (and in this order):

  • healthy food
  • rent
  • monthly bills and gas
  • a little extra money for other items including occasional eating out or clothing, household items (last month it was a new tire for $200), and other miscellaneous that budget and save for
Our budget for items like clothes, vacations, entertainment, and hobbies is few and far between. And it’s the same for many people: ordinary folks who have families and who are on one income, singles with one income, people who have had their income reduced or their jobs eliminated and who are unemployed or work part-time while they look for something else, college students, and those who are retired and on a fixed income; these are the people who make up the bulk of our population.
There are people in these demographic populations who want to be healthier, want to avoid toxic chemicals, and desire to consume more nutrients in their food. Does that make them snobbish? Apparently in some figurative universe that is so. However, in the real world and for real people: To eat healthy means to do without extras, to save wherever you can, and to find the best deals available.  So yeah, last time I checked, people like my husband and all the others I described are not the highfalutin, elitist, types. 

Organic and sustainable too expensive?

Another myth that should be dispelled right here and right now is that it’s too expensive to eat healtier. I’m here to tell you that finding good deals on locally-raised, sustainable food is not only possible, it’s done by many and our family does it regularly. If you know what to look for, you can find some great deals.  The mainstream health and food industries are not only fond of saying it’s snobbish to eat healthy food, but that since you can’t afford it, you might as well buy their toxic, chemical-filled foods (which by the way, aren’t as cheap as they’d like you think).
If you continue to insist that the only way to buy organic food is to shop at Whole Foods, you will indeed be disappointed. Chances are things will never change for you. Products sold at stores such as Whole Foods are by and large overpriced and you are not getting your money’s worth in many cases because you don’t even know for certain if the food is what it says it is on the label. Read 8 reasons I won’t shop at Whole Foods when it opens in Boise, Idaho (they are now open and I haven’t shopped there once). If you say you can’t afford to eat better, maybe it’s time to change priorities and make it happen.
By supporting local, sustainable farmers in your own community who are transparent in their farming methods, you can likely find a way to afford the food you want – especially if you are willing to do without all the luxuries and extras you think you need.
To say that buying organic food is no better for your health than conventional or is not worth the money spent is ignoring long-term health effects of eating healthy to decrease the risk of developing degenerative disease and illness.  Eating healthy now will save you medical costs later. It’s that simple.
Read Is cheap food really cheap? The hidden costs of industrial food. Look at the comparative analysis of several processed foods versus a real, whole food free from chemicals and other toxins typically found in industrial food from Windy Ridge Poultry, in Alfred, NY.  This poster was created by a farmer who uses it at his farm booth at the farmer’s market each week.
It’s quite amazing how expensive processed and mainstream foods are.  And, you won’t get anything for your money besides toxins, chemicals, and health problems. You are also donating tax dollars for government subsidies which go to big corporations for these “food-like” products.

“Grassfed is not much different than feedlot”

Dr. Oz said, “Nutritionally, there is not much difference between, say, grass-fed beef and the feedlot variety. The calories, sodium and protein content are all very close. Any lean meats are generally fine as long as the serving size is correct–and that means 4 to 6 oz., roughly the size of your palm. A modest serving like that can be difficult in a country with as deep a meat tradition as ours, where steak houses serve up 24-oz. portions and the term meat and potatoes is a synonym for good eating. But good eating isn’t always healthy eating, and we’re not even built to handle so much animal protein, since early humans simply did not have meat available at every meal. Sticking with reasonable portions two or three times a week will keep you in step with evolution.”

This statement is laughable on so many levels, it’s hard to know where to start. Grassfed beef most certainly is head and shoulders above feedlot beef. It comes from cattle that are healthy and living on pasture, where nature intended, and are not injected with hormones or administered antibiotics. If the farmer is conscientious about the health of the animals, environment, and people who consume the meat, they won’t use GM feed for their cattle either.

Nutrient levels in grass-fed meats are naturally higher as a result of good farming practices: fat-soluble vitamins A, D, & E, minerals like iron and zinc, Omega 3s, and CLA (conjugated linoleic acid). These nutrients “virtually vanish” in the feedlot environment from lack of exposure to sunshine, fresh air, grazing, and nutritive soil according to Eat Wild.

Feedlot meat’s unbalanced nutritional profile of Omega 6 EFAs

Feedlot meat is also higher in inflammatory Omega 6s, which people in developed countries such as the U.S. have in excess,  and which causes chronic health issues and inflammation that contribute to Metabolic Syndrome, heart disease, obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes, and stroke.

Contrary to most conventional medical advice, lean meats sold on the conventional market are not healthy for us to consume.  Read Deceptions in the Food Industry: Lean meats to learn more about why this is true.

Read Health Benefits of Grass-fed Products from Eat Wild, The Amazing Benefits of Grass-fed Meat from Mother Earth News and The Health Benefits of Grass-fed Beef from Body Ecology.

Organic is not more nutritious

Dr. Oz persists in the idea that organic is no better nutritionally than conventional. These ideas have been refuted againagain and again by various studies.  Even the Stanford study tried to say the same thing, and yet found nothing new. The results were just a compilation of previous studies, and it was revealed that the funding provided to Stanford for this effort came largely from big agricultural and biotech interests.

To say that buying organic food is no better for your health than conventional or is not worth the money spent is ignoring the long-term health effects of eating healthy on the risk of developing degenerative disease and illness.  Eating healthy now will save you medical costs later. It’s that simple.
Remember, just because a bunch of mainstream sources who receive funding by big agriculture, health, and biotech entities tell the same lie over and over again, doesn’t make it true. Always follow the money.

GMOs, pesticides, antibiotics, hormones, and other toxins

Some of  the most obvious benefits of eating organic food are that they are grown without antibiotics, hormones, herbicides, pesticides, GMOs, and other harmful chemicals.  But Dr. Oz also doesn’t seem to be concerned about these issues with conventional foods nor that they are treated with chemicals, pesticides, hormones, antibiotics, and are genetically-modified. It’s especially ironic that he’s taken this stance when not so long ago, he allowed Jeffery Smith from the Institute for Responsible Technology to come on his show and talk about the dangers of GMOs right before the California Right To Know GMO labeling ballot initiative would be voted in.

He also allowed conventional scientists and other “experts” to come on the show, who demanded that Jeffery Smith leave the stage before coming on to talk about their viewpoint (which is pro-GMO). If Dr. Oz were a thinking person, he would have told those other scientists that it was his show and they should all be able to share the stage together (he’s had Jeffrey Smith as a guest in the past, with conventional scientists sitting there on the same stage refuting the information he provided).

Dr. Oz, who endorsed GM labeling and revealed that his wife worked on the Proposition 37 campaign to label GMOs, and has stated that to be safe, we should stick with organic foods:

In fact, he said that he prefers to be “cautious” at the end of a segment on his show filmed in October of this year (2012) titled GMO Foods: Are They Dangerous to Your Health? “Right now we have no way of knowing which foods have been genetically modified. I believe you should have that right,” he said. Wow, how much more inconsistent can you get, good Doctor? It’s clear that he’s trying to be all things to all people.

Read Busting myths about GMOs (genetically-modified organism)s if this topic is new to you and learn just how dangerous these substances really are. Also read Stanford study on organics: manipulating consumers into buying GMO products.

In light of all Dr. Oz’s conflicting statements that never seem to agree with one another, it’s pretty clear that he’s being paid off to say the things he does, and that depending on what day you turn his show on your television, you’ll get a different answer.  He pretends to be holistic in his approach to health, but in the end, his advice ultimately serves the interests of the powerful and rich who aren’t concerned about the health, well-being or future of the world’s citizens. The things he says are not just false and irresponsible, but reckless. And the fact that he has such a massive following of people who hang on his every word for health advice makes him dangerous.

I think this should go without saying, but if you are in doubt…at best, be deeply suspicious of his ability to tell the truth – no matter how many of your friends and family are his faithful fans.

More information on real, sustainable food for your family:

What are traditional foods?

Food budgets – Using creativity and prioritizing for healthy eating 

Waste not, want not: Tips for saving in the kitchen

Healthy Living Healthy Meat Real Food Toxin Alert!

In the Face of the Feed Crisis, Beef Expert Claims Ruminants Can Digest “Anything”

www.mypicshares.com
Yesterday as I was driving home from taking my son to school, a report on NPR about the issues with the rising cost of feeding commercial cattle in today’s wavering economic market made my blood boil.

What I heard made me realize the issues we are having with GMOs in our food supply are compounding due to the fact that the industry which relies almost solely on corn, grain, and soy to feed cattle will stop at nothing to cut costs and convince the public at the same time that these methods and activities are not only safe but necessary to “feed the world”.

It also made me realize the  industrial food industry will also stop at nothing to reassure the public that their far-fetched and wholly unsafe practices are not only just fine but somehow “better for the environment”… including, telling lie upon ludicrous lie to get it done with false science and bad political maneuvering.

“Alternatives” to corn, soy, and grain

The discussion went into how droughts and wildfires, which have ravaged range lands this season, are forcing farmers to look for more “efficient ways” to feed their cattle. According to the report, beef scientist Tim DelCurto from Oregon State University has alternatives for ranchers and feedlot owners that provide lower cost feed now that corn and soy prices are skyrocketing. These include:

“Grass seed straw, distillers grains leftover from ethanol production, cannery waste and potato processing byproducts such as misshapen green beans, carrots and even French fries.”

DelCurto believes that ruminants can easily adapt to other feed and it doesn’t affect their health. He said, “I think one of the unique attributes of beef cattle, and sheep fit this too, unique attributes of ruminant animals is that they can digest virtually anything.”

This month, DelCurto will speak at several University of Idaho Extension classes where he will be sharing these “cost saving tips” with cattle ranchers.

It is this twisted way of thinking which has ushered in the predominance of antibiotic and hormone use in commercial cattle farming today, which has greatly contributed to inflammatory disease in both cattle and humans, including digestive, endocrine, and auto-immune disorders, antibiotic resistance, and super bug bacteria which can’t be managed by normal medical care.

It is beyond shameful that we are allowing our universities to be used to support big agriculture’s agendas, which for decades have had negative consequences for our food system, health, and environment.

Other news reports have been flooding the wires over the couple of weeks about the use of even more unsavory substances for feeding cattle as a way to counter the effects of rising feed costs:

“cookies, gummy worms, marshmallows, fruit loops, orange peels, even dried cranberries”

These substances are being used as alternatives to the starchy corn, soy, and grain feeds used by conventional farming facilities to put weight on cattle. All of these alternatives to soy, corn, and grain are highly processed and many are by-products of the commercial farming, food, and chemical industries…and many of these contain GMOs as well. Really? Cookies and gummy worms?

It should go without saying, but these “experts” and “scientists” have it all wrong.  It’s absolutely unthinkable that anyone calling themselves a caretaker of the environment or steward of the land would even suggest the preposterous notion of feeding cattle these kinds of substances is acceptable. Does it really seem reasonable that animals being slaughtered for meat should be fed these substances? And if they are allowed to consume them, what affect might that have on their health, and our health when we eat the meat from these animals?  Our ancestors would have never agreed to this practice.

These measures used by the food industry are not about taking care of the health and well-being of anything or anyone involved, they are about profits.

The GMO factor

Corn, soy, and grains are not healthy feed for cattle, which are ruminants and are intended to graze on green grass.  Even without the GM component, these feeds cause health problems for animals consuming them. Cattle who eat this kind of feed develop acidity in the digestive tract, and because cattle become vulnerable to disease and sickness, farmers administrate antibiotics.

A recent study showing the results of a life-time of feeding  rats a certain type of genetically engineered corn common in the U.S. food supply looks even more unfavorable. These findings were published in the peer-reviewed journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology, and showed the development of massive tumors in the bodies of rats and also included liver and kidney damage, and premature death. There have been over 30 additional studies showing the presence of toxic or allergic reactions in animals consuming GE foods.

It may seem like if these issues were such a threat, you’d see people dying of premature death everywhere. But consider that rats don’t live very long, their life span is at most 3-4 years. Human life spans are much longer, the average being about 75. The fact is, many people are experiencing chronic health issues that have not been seen before on the scale that degenerative disease is occurring, but are being allowed to continue living through the intervention of drugs, surgeries, and other medical procedures. Genetic engineering is a relatively new development, but GMOs have been in our food supply now since 1996.  The long-term effects of consuming GE foods simply aren’t known yet.

Meanwhile, Monsanto and other seed companies are working night and day trying to get more GM crops approved. Mounting evidence is showing that GE crops are failing to live up to the hype that has been propagated about their “benefits”.

Informed scientists such as Dr. Donald Huber have spoken and written about the dire consequences of chemical-based monoculture crops which degenerate soil integrity. His research shows that GE crops cause even more harm to the soil than conventional farming. GE farming uses the application of broad-spectrum herbicides on the genetically engineered mono-crops, resulting in herbicide-resistant super-weeds.  These plants are just about impossible to destroy. Ronnie Cummins from The Organic Consumer’s Association stated: “Scientists estimate that herbicide-resistant crops planted around the globe will triple the amount of toxic broad-spectrum herbicides used in agriculture”.

It should be easy to see the failure of this chemical system in the destruction of vital soil for supporting life, the lack of diversity in continued monoculture crops, the loss of heirloom and indigenous seeds that have been traditionally saved and planted in successive seasons, and the massive debt piled upon tens of thousands of farmers who use these programs to grow their crops and support their families (and who are beholden to Monsanto and other seed companies due to strict contracts they sign).

The fact is, many countries such as Haiti and others have been bullied by Monsanto and other seed companies into using their seeds for farming. In 2010, Haiti rejected the seeds and burned them. In 2011, GM maize was ploughed under in Hungary, according to Ministry of Rural Development Lajos Bognar. It also happened in Zambia as well. All of these countries have food shortages, but also have serious doubts about the safety of GM seeds.

What’s the alternative?

Joel Salatin, grassfed beef farmer in Swope, VA has explained the virtues of grassfeeding ruminant animals, and pasture-raising other livestock such as pigs. Instead of mass-scale factory farming that pollutes the environment, soil, water, and harms human and animal health, he advocates for smaller-scale farming that utilizes nature to support the ecosystem of the farm. Salatin’s 100 acre organic spread thrives on the symbiotic relationship between the grazing cattle and roaming chickens to provide nourishment to the land and themselves. This type of farming can and does quite well without hormones, antibiotics, pesticides, and GMOs.

Stanley Fishman of Tender Grassfed Meat has an excellent post describing how properly managed grassfed farms can produce healthy meat for people to eat.  Not only can the farms thrive, they can help with water supply issues which are becoming an increasing excuse for chemical and seed companies to engineer toxic alternatives to traditional farming.

“The world’s water supply can be greatly increased by increasing the number of grazing animals, and having them follow proper grazing practices. Not only will this greatly increase the water supply, but it will result in the creation of great amounts of new soil suitable for growing crops, and increase the size and richness of grasslands, allowing even more herds to graze. And the grassfed meat made available by following this path will provide the food that is far more nutrient-dense and nourishing than a plant-only diet.”

There are also other farmers who are finding ways to keep their stock on range lands and grazing, while preserving the ecology, as nature intended. In southeast Oregon, ranchers are embracing the natural landscapes and allowing their cattle to roam on desert areas, eating high-desert grasses.

In Simon Fairlie’s book, Meat: A Benign Extravagence, he devotes a considerable amount of discussion about small-scale, holistic meat farming and how we can continue to feed the growing populations of the world. This book so succinctly and profoundly lays out the methods and mechanisms by which we should undertake humane and smaller-scale meat production, George Monbiot, environmental activist and vegan, regarded this book as a life-changing read and discarded his support for veganism after reading it.

What can you do?

Supporting our local, grassfed meat farmers which contribute positively to the ecosystem and local economies instead of GMO and commercial farming is imperative. If we don’t abandon these toxic, modern systems of food production, we will wipe out our fertile soil and ability to produce food for the future.

  • Be aware of the fact that 90 percent or more of foods you buy at the store probably contain GMOs. Read labels and avoid these products as best you can. Avoid buying grocery store meats from unhealthy animals, which are full of antibiotics, hormones, and residue from pesticides, GMOs, and other toxic chemicals.
  • Get involved in local efforts in your home state to institute labeling on GMO foods.
  • Educate others by spreading the word!

More information:

Health benefits, grassfed meat, Eat Wild

The grassfed beef challenge: Busting myths about meat - read about the great health benefits of grassfed meats and why the myths about meat being harmful to eat are untrue

Grassfed Cattle, Not Junkfed Cattle

10 reasons to avoid GMOs

Learn how GMOs affect our health

Support the California Right to Know campaign and get involved in your state and local area to label GMOs and boycott GMO foods

4 ways to avoid GMOs in the foods you buy

Photo credit: TheInternational.org